32:T4e4,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Mayor of Savannah v. Morehead, 87 S.E. 1046","datePublished":"1916-02-26","legislationDate":"1916-02-26","citation":"Mayor of Savannah v. Morehead, 87 S.E. 1046 (Ga. 1916)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Supreme Court of Georgia","description":"Read the full text of Mayor of Savannah v. Morehead (Mayor of Savannah v. Morehead, 87 S.E. 1046 (Ga. 1916)). This legal opinion, filed in 1916-02-26, from the Supreme Court of Georgia discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/mayor-of-savannah-v-morehead--5580839"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/mayor-of-savannah-v-morehead--5580839","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Mayor of Savannah v. Morehead, Supreme Court of Georgia, Mayor of Savannah v. Morehead, 87 S.E. 1046 (Ga. 1916)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T405,

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam.

These eases are controlled by the decision this day rendered in the case of Hazleton v. City of Atlanta, ante, 775. The points made in the present cases, additional to those there specifically dealt with, are not sufficient to require a different ruling. Under this ruling, it was error to grant an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment reversed in each case.

All the Justices concur.

Concurrence Opinion

Beck and Hill, JJ.

While our opinion as to the questions dealt with in the case of Hazleton v. City of Atlanta, this day decided, has undergone no change, we concur in the judgment of reversal, because of the ruling in that ease.