59 N.J.L. 426 | N.J. | 1896
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This case is not properly before the court.
It is a writ of error directed to the Supreme Court, requiring it to send up an order made by it authorizing the issuance
But if these defects in the procedure were absent, nevertheless the writ in this case would have been dismissed. The decision of the Supreme Court that is sought to be challenged in this proceeding is not one that is reviewable by this court. More than thirty years ago it was decided that a writ of error would not lie to an order directing a mandamus to issue. The case referred to is that of Layton v. State, 4 Dutcher 575. This was the common law rule, and it prevails whenever unaffected by a statutory regulation. American Transportation and Navigation Co. v. New York, &c., Co., ante p. 156. In the present instance, all that was done in the Supreme Court was a formal adjudication on motion that the writ should be issued, such decision not being founded, there being no question considered as to the constitutionality or unconstitutionality of- any statute, nor was any issue formed upon pleadings, so that there is no statutory authority that will justify the transference of the case to this court.
Therefore, let this writ be dismissed.
Chief Justice Beasley was prevented by illness from being present when this cause was disposed of.