There being no error of law complained of, and the evidence, though conflicting, authorizing the judgment rendered by the judge of the city court presiding without a jury, there was no error in his refusal to grant a new trial in the case.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
