| N.J. | Nov 20, 1922

Per Curiam.

This case is governed by the opinion in Ho. 1 of the present term. Jersey City v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal, ante p. 155.

■ The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 15.

For reversal — Hone.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.