History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mayers v. State
47 Tex. Crim. 624
Tex. Crim. App.
1905
Check Treatment

Appellant was convicted of forgery, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years; hence this appeal. An examination of the indictment discloses that it is insufficient. The pleader attempted to set out the alleged forged instrument according to its purport and tenor. In the purport clause the instrument is charged to be the act of Gay Simpson. When the instrument is set out according to its tenor, it appears to be signed by Mayers and Simpson. This is a variance, according to the authorities, between the purport and tenor clauses, and is fatal to the indictment. Campbell v. State, 32 S.W. Rep., 899; Fite v. State, 34 S.W. Rep., 921; Stephens v. State, 37 S.W. Rep., 425; Gibbons v. State, 37 S.W. Rep., 861; Crayton v. State, 7 Texas Ct. Rep., 973. It is not necessary to discuss other propositions. Because the indictment is insufficient, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Mayers v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 22, 1905
Citation: 47 Tex. Crim. 624
Docket Number: No. 3245.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.