History
  • No items yet
midpage
May v. Heiner
32 F.2d 1017
3rd Cir.
1929
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, on the opinion of the court below [25 F.(2d) 1004], with the observation that this case is distinguished from Nichols v. Coolidge, 274 U. S. 531, 47 S. Ct. 710; 71 L. Ed. 1184, 52 A. L. R. 1081, on the facts.

Case Details

Case Name: May v. Heiner
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date Published: Jan 9, 1929
Citation: 32 F.2d 1017
Docket Number: No. 3811
Court Abbreviation: 3rd Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.