History
  • No items yet
midpage
Maxwell v. Bishop
393 U.S. 997
SCOTUS
1968
Check Treatment

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 2 and 3 of the petition which read as follows:

“2. Whether Arkansas’ practice of permitting the trial jury absolute discretion, uncontrolled by standards or directions of any kind, to impose the death penalty violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
“3. Whether Arkansas’ single-verdict procedure, which requires the jury to determine guilt and punishment simultaneously and a defendant to choose between presenting mitigating evidence on the punishment issue or maintaining his privilege against self-incrimination on *998the guilt issue, violates the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments?”
Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Norman C. Amaker, Michael Melts-ner, George Howard, Jr., and Anthony G. Amsterdam for petitioner. Joe Purcell, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Don Langston, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

Case set for oral argument immediately following No. 642 [Boykin v. Alabama, ante, p. 820].

Case Details

Case Name: Maxwell v. Bishop
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 16, 1968
Citation: 393 U.S. 997
Docket Number: No. 622
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.