Case Information
*1 Case 2:24-cv-00769-RGK-KS Document 41 Filed 01/06/25 Page 1 of 2 Page ID
#:503 JS6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MAXIMILLIAN A. BOWMAN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:24-CV-00769-RGK-KS
Plaintiff, v. [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT FOLLOWING ORDER ON DEFENDANT TESLA, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TESLA MOTORS, INC., DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive,
Defendants.
Courtroom: 850, 8 th Floor Judge: Hon. Gary Klausner Date: December 9, 2024 Time: 9:00 a.m. Trial Date: January 21, 2025 *2 Case 2:24-cv-00769-RGK-KS Document 41 Filed 01/06/25 Page 2 of 2 Page ID
#:504
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN: The Motion of Defendant Tesla, Inc, erroneously named as Tesla Motors, Inc., for summary judgment in the above-captioned case was taken under submission on the papers and ruled upon by the Honorable R. Gary Klausner of the above-entitled Court. The Court, having read and considered all of the written arguments and evidence submitted by the parties, including all inferences reasonably deducible from the evidence, except those which may have been contradicted by other inferences or evidence, finds that there is no triable issue as to any material fact on any of Plaintiff Maximilian A. Bowman’s causes of action against Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc., and that Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc. is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law against Plaintiff.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment is hereby granted, and judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc. and against Plaintiff Maximilian A. Bowman on the entire Complaint. 1/6/2025 Dated: ________________________ ________________________
18 Hon. Gary Klausner 19 20 Proposed Judgment Submitted by:
21 Soheyl Tahsildoost (Bar No. 271294) Adam Knighton (Bar No. 335072) THETA LAW FIRM, LLP 12100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1070 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Telephone: (424) 297-3103 Facsimile: (424) 286-2244
22
23
24 eservice@thetafirm.com
25 Attorneys for Defendant Tesla, Inc.
26
27
28
[2] [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT TESLA, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[1] [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT TESLA, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT