Maull v. State
37 Ala. 160
Ala.1861Check TreatmentThe offenses charged tp have been committed by the defendants, do not appear from the indictment to have been perpetrated by any joint act; but, for aught disclosed, may have been altogether distinct, neither defendant participating in the criminal act of the other. For this reason, tbe indictment was demurrable for duplicity. — Shaw v. State, 18 Ala. 547.
The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded.