midpage

Maull v. StateMaull v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jan 15, 1861
Reporters:
Before:
Walker
A. J. WALKER, C. J.

The offenses charged tp have been committed by the defendants, do not appear from the indictment to have been perpetrated by any joint act; but, for aught disclosed, may have been altogether distinct, neither defendant participating in the criminal act of the other. For this reason, tbe indictment was demurrable for duplicity. — Shaw v. State, 18 Ala. 547.

The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Maull v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jan 15, 1861
Citation: 37 Ala. 160
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
Log In