History
  • No items yet
midpage
Maugia v. State
90 Tex. Crim. 539
Tex. Crim. App.
1922
Check Treatment

The appeal is from a judgment convicting the appellant of the offense of burglary.

The Assistant Attorney General suggests the escape of appellant, attaching the affidavit of the sheriff of Coleman County to the effect that the appellant escaped from jail on the 20th day of December last and was recaptured on the following day. This escape ousted this court of jurisdiction of his appeal. Code of Crim. Proc., Art. 912. Jurisdiction is not restored by his recapture. Lunsford v. State, 10 Texas Crim. App., 118; Ex parte Wood, 19 Texas Crim. App., 46; Loyd v. State, 19 Texas Crim. App., 137.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Maugia v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jan 11, 1922
Citation: 90 Tex. Crim. 539
Docket Number: No. 6529.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.