History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mauger v. Crosby
117 Mass. 330
Mass.
1875
Check Treatment
By the Court.

Independently of the two letters admitted under objection, there was evidence from which it would have been competent for the jury to find that the plaintiff accepted the proposition of Crosby & Co., as stated in their letter inclosing the notes in suit; and that he sent the machine to them in accordance therewith. If so, the transaction was complete, and the plaintiff became entitled to hold and collect the notes. By the terms of the report there must therefore be

' Judgment for the ‘¡plaintiff.

Case Details

Case Name: Mauger v. Crosby
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Mar 24, 1875
Citation: 117 Mass. 330
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.