History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matthews v. Matthews
189 So. 2d 629
Fla.
1966
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We have heard oral argument on the petition for certiorari to review a decision of the Court of Appeal, Second District, 177 So.2d 497, because of apparent jurisdiction in this court.

After oral argument and a careful study of the record and briefs, we conclude this: court is without jurisdiction in the matter because of lack of a direct conflict as required by the Constitution, Article V, Section 4, F.S.A.

The writ is discharged.

"THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and BARNS-PAUL D., (Retired), JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Matthews v. Matthews
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Apr 20, 1966
Citation: 189 So. 2d 629
Docket Number: No. 34625
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.