History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matthews v. Daniel
3 N.C. 346
Sup. Ct. N.C.
1805
Check Treatment
"pER Curiam.

-The testator devised a Negro man and a horse, * to his daughter and her heirsĀ” and if she dies -without heirs of her body, then over to the defendant. This is not'good ex-ecutory devise ; the event is too remote upon which the limitation over is to take effect. The argument, that here the event must happen, if at all, in the life time of the Negro, and that so the event is limited to alife in being, has at least the merit ofno* velty to recommend it, but will not bring the case within tile legal limits.

The demurrer must be over-ruledj and the defendant answer.

Case Details

Case Name: Matthews v. Daniel
Court Name: Superior Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 15, 1805
Citation: 3 N.C. 346
Court Abbreviation: Sup. Ct. N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.