History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matter of Walton
510 N.W.2d 203
Minn.
1994
Check Treatment

*1 203 later, during evening drinking an of months Dwight of In the Matter friends, group partially with a of Walton (NMN) WALTON. briefly fon- sleeping a woman and disrobed No. C9-92-1749. genital breasts and area. Walton dled her charged attempted criminal sexual was with of Minnesota. Supreme Court charge degree. in the third This conduct July 21 burglary charge from the and a 14, 1994. Jan. dropped exchange in for Wal- incident were guilty degree criminal plea ton’s of to fourth conduct, he was sentenced sexual for which 15, 1990, to 29 months less time on October scheduled to be re- served. Walton was 2,May on 1992. leased Eliason, Paul, ap- Harry E. South St. for 1992, February at Park In of staff Oak pellant. Dakota Heights referred to the Walton for County Attorney’s Office to be screened Baekstrom, County Atty., Dakota James C. personality. psychopathic as a commitment County Atty., Halpenny, Asst. Pauline M. peti- county attorney filed a commitment The Hastings, respondent. for 17, hearing April 1992. The initial tion on the April on 29 and 30 before was held Judge K. Honorable Patrice Sutherland. that the state had met concluded Sutherland “by proof presenting of clear and its burden SIMONETT, Justice. [appellant] meets convincing evidence that statutory Psychopathic a Per- criteria of the Dwight was determined to be a Walton § in 526.09 sonality” as defined Minn.Stat. by personality” as defined “psychopathic (1992). appellant committed to ordered She (1992) § and was commit- Minn.Stat. 526.09 (MSH) Security Hospital Minnesota for a the Security Hospital for an ted to the Minnesota 60-day evaluation. appeals the period of time. He indefinite affirming the appeals of the court of decision 24, 1992, Dr. Michael Farnsworth On June Specifically, order. Walton commitment 60-day report the the with of MSH filed constitutionality challenges of sections the court, sex labelling appellant a “recidivist light in of the United States Su- 526.09-.10 ill, who, may mentally be not offender” while in Foucha v. Louisi- preme Court’s decision hearing, on final held dangerous. After the — 1780, ana, -, 112 S.Ct. 118 U.S. 15, prior confirmed its July 8 and the court (1992). holding in We find our L.Ed.2d 437 conclusions, § consti found Minn.Stat. 526.09 (Minn.1994) Blodgett, re 510 N.W.2d 910 In tutional, appellant committed and ordered controlling affirm. and psychopathic per indefinitely to as a MSH sonality. appeals affirmed the The court of began history violence of sexual Walton’s court, finding its deci judgment trial of the 1986, he was convicted of first and in when (Minn. Blodgett, in In re 490 N.W.2d 638 sion degree criminal sexual conduct and sen- third Walton, re App.1992), controlling. See In months, respectively. In to and 32 tenced 43 3-1, C9-92-1749, slip op. at 1992 WL No. participated in several prison, appellant 1992) 29, (unpub (Minn.App. 383448 Dec. offenders. He programs for sex treatment lished). 15, August 1989. was released on (Minn. later, 21, 1990, Blodgett, 910 July In In re 510 N.W.2d year on Less than a 1994), Psychopathic that the Person- apartment we held into a second floor broke Walton Statutes, §§ did ality 526.09-10 by Minn.Stat. observing occupied it was a woman after Equal Pro- Process and not violate the Due daughter. Although he fled when and her Amend- screamed, of the Fourteenth ad- tection Clauses and Walton the woman awoke Our of the United States Constitution. rape the woman. Two ment mitted he intended to *2 204 Blodgett disposition of

holding in controls the appeal. The decision of the court of

Walton’s affirming of

appeals the trial court’s order

commitment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

WAHL, (dissenting). Justice my in

For reasons stated in dissent In re today, respectfully I

Blodgett, released dis-

sent.

KEITH, (dissenting). Chief Justice join

I the dissent of Justice Wahl.

TOMLJANOVICH, (dissenting). Justice join

I the dissent of Justice Wahl.

Douglas KRUEGER, Appellant, P.

v.

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY

COMPANY, al., Respondents. et

No. C1-93-928. Appeals,

Court of of Minnesota. 28,

Dec. 1993.

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Walton
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jan 14, 1994
Citation: 510 N.W.2d 203
Docket Number: C9-92-1749
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.