Matter of Torres v PrackMatter of Torres v Prack
In the Matter of Hector Torres, Petitioner, v Albert Prack, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton and Garrison, LLP, New York City (Aaron H. Crowell of counsel) and John Boston, Legal Aid Society of New York City, New York City, for petitioner.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent. Peters, P.J. Proceeding pursuant to
Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of a prison disciplinary rule that prohibits engaging in or possessing materials related to an unauthorized organization that advocates certain proscribed conduct. After petitioner‘s administrative appeal was unsuccessful, he commenced this proceeding pursuant to
The Attorney General‘s office has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner‘s institutional record. Accordingly, petitioner has been afforded all of the relief to which he is entitled and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Gilkes v Bezio, 68 AD3d 1226, 1226 [2009]; Matter of Knight v Selsky, 19 AD3d 917, 917 [2005]).
Lahtinen, Kavanagh, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.