History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matter of Tompkins v. Bruckner
249 N.Y. 510
| NY | 1928
|
Check Treatment

The order was affirmed upon the ground that there was no clear legal duty on the part of the Borough President to remove bungalows from streets which had not yet been regulated and opened to the public.

The motion for reargument should be denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements.

CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, ANDREWS, LEHMAN, KELLOGG and O'BRIEN, JJ., concur. *Page 511

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Tompkins v. Bruckner
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 9, 1928
Citation: 249 N.Y. 510
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.