Matter of Smith v. . O.M. Osterheld Son
129 N.E. 901 | NY | 1920
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, HOGAN, CARDOZO, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ELKUS, JJ. *527
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.