History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matter of Rothschild
195 N.E. 222
| NY | 1935
|
Check Treatment

The motion for reargument is denied. The disposition of the matter made below can leave no shadow of moral obliquity or of unprofessional conduct on appellant. The services rendered to his client were reasonably worth the sum claimed by him. He was not without ground for believing he was entitled to that sum. He was certainly entitled to litigate a fair dispute without being charged with wrongdoing. There was no wrongdoing of any kind, and the phrase "wrongfully withheld" in the title hereto, is no doubt an unintentional misdescription.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. *Page 610

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Rothschild
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 5, 1935
Citation: 195 N.E. 222
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.