Matter of Rosenbloom v. RosenbloomMatter of Rosenbloom v. Rosenbloom
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The subject child has been living in foster care since May of 2011. The appellant, the child‘s paternal grandmother, petitioned for custody of the child in February of 2013. In May of 2013, the parental rights of the child‘s parents were terminated, guardianship and custody of the child were transferred to the Orange County Department of Social Services, and she was freed for adoption. The grandmother‘s custody petition was thereafter dismissed.
The Family Court properly denied the petition for custody without a hearing, “as the appellant‘s recourse was to seek adoption, not mere custody,” of the child (Matter of McHarris v Administration for Children‘s Servs., 53 AD3d 660, 660-661 [2008]; see Matter of Snypes v Administration for Children‘s Servs., 308 AD2d 593 [2003]; Matter of Patience B. v Administration for Children‘s Servs., 306 AD2d 473 [2003]; Matter of Irons v Ford, 289 AD2d 576, 577 [2001]; Matter of Annie H., 207 AD2d 788, 789 [1994];