Matter of Rogalin v. N.Y. City Teachers' Retirement Bd
290 N.Y. 664 | NY | 1943
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ. LEHMAN, Ch. J., FINCH and LEWIS, JJ., dissent on the ground that the filing of charges and suspension from a position in the public service terminates such service conditionally or at least interrupts it and retirement must await restoration to the public service. (Matter of Eberle v. La Guardia,