History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matter of Quinn
115 N.E. 442
| NY | 1917
|
Check Treatment

The order should be affirmed under the provisions of section 374 of the Election Law, which is broad enough in its terms to entitle any candidate voted for at the time of a general election to an examination as of right in a proper case of any ballots upon which his name lawfully appears as that of a candidate whether the validity of the election is in controversy or not. The provisions of section 67 of the Town Law relating to an examination and recount of ballots in case of contests provides a wholly distinct and different remedy.

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Quinn
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 27, 1917
Citation: 115 N.E. 442
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.