In the Matter of MALKEET S., Appellant. HARJIT SINGH, Petitioner; MOHINDER KAUR et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York
[26 NYS3d 330]
Balkin, J.P., Roman, Cohen and Maltese, JJ.
Julie Stanton, Ct. Atty. Ref.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In March 2014, the petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to
Pursuant to
Upon our independent factual review, we find that, contrary to the petitioner‘s contention, the record does not support a determination that reunification with one or both of the child‘s parents is not viable due to parental abuse, neglect, abandonment, or a similar basis found under State law, nor that it would not be in the child‘s best interests to be returned to India (see Matter of Miguel A.G.G. [Milton N.G.G.], 127 AD3d at 859; Matter of Marvin E.M. de P. [Milagro C.C.—Mario Enrique M.G.], 121 AD3d 892, 893 [2014]). Balkin, J.P., Roman, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.
