Matter of Knibbs v ZemanMatter of Knibbs v Zeman
Richard N. Lentino, Middletown, N.Y., for respondent.
Jessica Bacal, Katonah, N.Y., Attorney for the Child.
In a family offense proceeding pursuant to
Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
A family offense must be established by a fair preponderance of the evidence (see
Contrary to the father‘s contention, the constitutional protection against double jeopardy presented no bar to the family offense proceeding (see People v Wood, 95 NY2d 509, 512-513 [2000]; Matter of Schneider v Arata, 81 AD3d 652 [2011]; Matter of Alfeo v Alfeo, 306 AD2d 471 [2003]). Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.