History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matter of Hinley v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company
243 N.Y. 570
| NY | 1926
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs against State Industrial Board; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ. *Page 571






Lead Opinion

no opinion.






Concurrence Opinion

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Hinley v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 9, 1926
Citation: 243 N.Y. 570
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.