History
  • No items yet
midpage
122 AD3d 992
N.Y. App. Div. 3rd
2014

Matter of Hayes v Annucci

Appellate Division, Third Department

November 6, 2014

2014 NY Slip Op 07554 [122 AD3d 992]

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 31, 2014

Sidney Hayes, Gouverneur, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination, after a tier III disciplinary hearing, finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the possession of alcohol. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged, and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner‘s inmate account. Although not mentioned in the letter from the Attorney General, we note that “any loss of good time incurred by petitioner as a result of the determination should be restored” (Matter of Benitez v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1237, 1238 [2014] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). In view of this, and given that petitioner has otherwise received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see id.; Matter of Loper v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1234, 1234 [2014]).

Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy, Rose and Devine, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Hayes v Annucci
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Third Department
Date Published: Nov 6, 2014
Citations: 122 AD3d 992; 2014 NY Slip Op 07554; 518710
Docket Number: 518710
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div. 3rd
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In