| NY | Jan 18, 1916

The order should be affirmed upon the ground that there is some evidence to support the charges, and that questions relating to the comparative weight of evidence or the fairness of the sentence, whatever may be our views about them, are beyond our jurisdiction (Matter of Flannery, 212 N.Y. 610" date_filed="1914-10-23" court="NY" case_name="Matter of Flannery">212 N.Y. 610).

WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, SEABURY and POUND, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.