32:T548,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Matter of Gillette Co. v. State Tax Comm'n, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2272","datePublished":"1978-10-19","legislationDate":"1978-10-19","citation":"Matter of Gillette Co. v. State Tax Comm'n, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2272 (NY 1978)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"New York Court of Appeals","description":"Read the full text of Matter of Gillette Co. v. State Tax Comm'n (Matter of Gillette Co. v. State Tax Comm'n, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2272 (NY 1978)). This legal opinion, filed in 1978-10-19, from the New York Court of Appeals discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/matter-of-gillette-co-v--2587613"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/matter-of-gillette-co-v--2587613","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Matter of Gillette Co. v. State Tax Comm'n, New York Court of Appeals, Matter of Gillette Co. v. State Tax Comm'n, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2272 (NY 1978)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T40f,

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. The dispositive issue presented on this appeal is whether respondent’s activities within New York State, which are concisely delineated in the opinion by then Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division (56 AD2d 475), go beyond the bounds of what may reasonably be deemed "mere” solicitation. We agree with the Appellate Division that they do not. Since respondent has not engaged in any additional activities within the State, it is exempt from the tax sought to be imposed by appellant (see US Code, tit 15, § 381, subd [a]; cf. United States Tobacco Co. v Commonwealth, 386 A2d 471 [Pa]).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.