History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matter of Dubinsky v. Joseph Love, Inc.
295 N.Y. 968
| NY | 1946
|
Check Treatment

Judgment of Appellate Division so far as appealed from reversed and that of Special Term in favor of appellant Hershkopf affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division on the ground that the allowance made by the Special Term to the arbitrator was lawful under sections 1457 and 1545 of the Civil Practice Act. No opinion.

Concur: LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and FULD, JJ. LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., and THACHER, J., dissent on the ground that the Appellate Division correctly construed sections 1457 and 1545 of the Civil Practice Act. Taking no part: DYE, J.

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Dubinsky v. Joseph Love, Inc.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 13, 1946
Citation: 295 N.Y. 968
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.