midpage

Matter of Burroughs v MartuscelloMatter of Burroughs v Martuscello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Third Department
Nov 27, 2013
516204
Versions:111 AD3d 1208
2013 NY Slip Op 07905

Lorcen Burroughs, Coxsackie, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Greene County) to review a determination by respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner‘s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner‘s inmate account. As such, petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Lopez v Fischer, 102 AD3d 1025, 1025 [2013]).

Lahtinen, J.P., Spain, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Burroughs v Martuscello
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Third Department
Date Published: Nov 27, 2013
Citations: 111 AD3d 1208; 2013 NY Slip Op 07905; 516204
Docket Number: 516204
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div. 3rd
Log In