Matter of Anastasia R. (Jessica R.)
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to issue a suspended judgment, as the evidence established that it would be in the subject child‘s best interest to be freed for adoption by her foster parents (see
Given the mother‘s refusal to testify at the dispositional hearing, even on an adjourned date, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in declining her request, based on her claim of illness, for a further adjournment (see Matter of Daija K.P. [Danielle P.], 129 AD3d 1087, 1088 [2015]; Matter of Xiao-Lan Ma v Washington, 127 AD3d 982 [2015]; Matter of Tripp, 101 AD3d 1137 [2012]).
The mother‘s remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.