History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matson v. Aiona
7 Haw. 158
Haw.
1887
Check Treatment

By the Court.

We think there is no ambiguity in the contract, as claimed by counsel for defendant. The ruling of the Court was in accordance with the well settled principle of law. This exception is therefore overruled.

There is a further exception that the judgment of the Court upon the facts is contrary to the law and the evidence. Upon a review of the case, we find that there was ample evidence to sustain the findings.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Matson v. Aiona
Court Name: Hawaii Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 15, 1887
Citation: 7 Haw. 158
Court Abbreviation: Haw.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.