Matson v. Aiona

7 Haw. 158 | Haw. | 1887

By the Court.

We think there is no ambiguity in the contract, as claimed by counsel for defendant. The ruling of the Court was in accordance with the well settled principle of law. This exception is therefore overruled.

There is a further exception that the judgment of the Court upon the facts is contrary to the law and the evidence. Upon a review of the case, we find that there was ample evidence to sustain the findings.

Exceptions overruled.