History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matone v. Sycamore Realty Corp.
858 N.Y.S.2d 202
N.Y. App. Div.
2008
Check Treatment

JOHN MATONE et al., Respondents, v SYCAMORE REALTY CORP., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

2008

858 NYS2d 202

JOHN MATONE et al., Respondents, v SYCAMORE REALTY CORP., Appellant, et al., Defendants. [858 NYS2d 202]—In an action, inter alia, to set aside a deed, the defendant Sycamore Realty Corp. appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated February 16, 2007, which granted the plaintiffs’ renewed motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 (a) for leave to enter judgment against it upon its default in appearing or answering, and to set aside the subject deed.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On its renewed motion, the plaintiffs demonstrated their entitlement to the entry of a default judgment against the appellant. The plaintiffs submitted proof of service of the summons and complaint, proof of the facts constituting their claim, and proof of the appellant’s default in answering or appearing (see CPLR 3215 [f]; Allstate Ins. Co. v Austin, 48 AD3d 720 [2008]; Grinage v City of New York, 45 AD3d 729 [2007]).

To avoid the entry of a default judgment, the appellant was required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its default and a meritorious defense to the action (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Petersen v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, P.C., 47 AD3d 783 [2008]; Giovanelli v Rivera, 23 AD3d 616 [2005]). The appellant failed to satisfy either requirement. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs’ renewed motion. Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Covello, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur. [See 14 Misc 3d 1217(A), 2007 NY Slip Op 50061(U).]

Case Details

Case Name: Matone v. Sycamore Realty Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 22, 2008
Citation: 858 N.Y.S.2d 202
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In