96 F. 792 | U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York | 1899
The Covered Tube Cable Railway Company,' a corporation organized to develop a specific tube system' relating to railway construction, obtained on March 4, 1886, an
The final question relates to the damages recoverable. It is claimed that “the contract for the services of Mathesius was countermanded before the time had arrived, or at least promptly on the arrival of the time for the rendition of such services,” and “that no part of the services of Mathesius for which the construction company was to pay the cable company a total of $7,500 were ever actually rendered by Mathesius.” Notwithstanding such attempted
No other question raised demands discussion. The motion for a. new trial is denied.