midpage

Matcovsky v. Days HotelMatcovsky v. Days Hotel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Sep 23, 2004
Versions:10 A.D.3d 557
782 N.Y.S.2d 64
2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11003

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered October 15, 2003, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff slipped and fell in a puddle of water in defendants’ hotel’s lobby, inter alia, denied defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant defendants’ cross motion, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants dismissing the complaint.

The complaint should have been dismissed for lack of evidence that defendants received any complaints or otherwise acquired actual notice of the alleged puddle, or that the puddle had existed for a sufficient period of time for defendants to have acquired constructive notice (see Garcia v Delgado Travel Agency, 4 AD3d 204 [2004], citing, inter alia, Kovelsky v City Univ., 221 AD2d 234 [1995]; and Wallace v Doral Tuscany Hotel, 302 AD2d 255 [2003]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Matcovsky v. Days Hotel
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 23, 2004
Citations: 10 A.D.3d 557; 782 N.Y.S.2d 64; 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11003
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In