History
  • No items yet
midpage
Masten v. Hunt
55 F. 78
1st Cir.
1893
Check Treatment
NELSON, District Judge.

We agree with the learned circuit judge who decided this case in the court below, for the reasons given in Ms opinion, which we adopt as the opinion of this court, that the appellant has shown, no infringement of his patent by the appellees. -1 common safety fuse inserted through a plug, such as Is used by the appellees in the manufacture of cannon crackers — -a device as old as the art of Masting, — cannot possibly Toe an equivalent for the combined fuse and match described in the first claim of the patent.

Decree affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Masten v. Hunt
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: Apr 13, 1893
Citation: 55 F. 78
Docket Number: No. 40
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.