Mastaccioula v. SciarraMastaccioula v. Sciarra
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff Patricia Mastaccioula (hereinafter the plaintiff) did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) through an affirmation of her examining physician, the plaintiffs deposition testimony, and the plaintiffs medical records (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,
Moreover, the plaintiff failed to submit any competent medical evidence to show that she was unable to perform substantially all of her daily activities for not less than 90 of the first 180 days following the subject accident (see Sainte-Aime v Ho,
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Santucci, J.P., Smith, S. Miller, Cozier and Fisher, JJ., concur.