History
  • No items yet
midpage
Masood v. Erwin Oil Co.
361 N.C. 579
| N.C. | 2007
|
Check Treatment
650 S.E.2d 595 (2007)

Akhtar MASOOD, Employee
v.
ERWIN OIL COMPANY, Employer,
EMC Insurance Companies, Carrier.

No. 94A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 12, 2007.

Patterson Harkavy, L.L.P., by Leto Copeley, Chapel Hill, for plaintiff-appellee.

Patterson, Dilthey, Clay & Bryson, L.L.P., by Phillip J. Anthony and Christopher J. Derrenbacher, Raleigh, for defendant-appellants.

Hatch, Little & Bunn, L.L.P., by Elizabeth T. Martin and Harold W. Berry, Jr., Raleigh, for North Carolina Petroleum Marketers Association, Inc., amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, the members of the Court are equally divided. Therefore, the Court of Appeals opinion is left undisturbed without precedential value. See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk, 360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006).

AFFIRMED.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Masood v. Erwin Oil Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Oct 12, 2007
Citation: 361 N.C. 579
Docket Number: 94A07
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.