History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martone v. Martone
224 Conn. 909
Conn.
1992
Check Treatment

The plaintiff’s cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 208 (AC 10420), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Having determined that a portion of the lump sum alimony award must be set aside, did the Appellate *910Court properly remand for a modified judgment rather than for a new hearing, or for a trial on all of the financial issues?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14628. Steven D. Ecker, in support of the petition. Max F. Brunswick, in opposition. Decided October 30, 1992

Case Details

Case Name: Martone v. Martone
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Oct 30, 1992
Citation: 224 Conn. 909
Docket Number: SC 14628
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.