Martinez v. TorresMartinez v. Torres
Ordered that the order dated April 26, 2011, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court properly determined that because the issues raised by the father in his objections were previously raised and decided against him on prior appeals in this matter (see Matter of Martinez v Torres, 59 AD3d 449 [2009]; Matter of Martinez v Torres, 26 AD3d 496 [2006]), reconsideration of those issues was barred by the doctrine of law of the case (see Matter of Suzuki-Peters v Peters, 37 AD3d 726 [2007]). Thus, the Family Court properly denied the father‘s objections. Dillon, J.P., Florio, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.