History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martin v. Sterling
1 Root 210
Conn. Super. Ct.
1790
Check Treatment
By the Court.

A tenant forfeiting his interest by granting a greater estate than he hath in the lands, is borrowed from the feudal system; but by the law of reason and common sense, and the laws of this state, a man’s deed or grant shall be good and valid, for so much as he hath right to, and void for the rest.

The defendant in his plea doth not traverse the seisin of the plaintiffs; he gives color to their title, but sets up none in himself; further he stands in the light of a total stranger: —The long possession of the plaintiffs, and of those under whom they claimed, by deeds of sale in fee, is sufficient against the naked possession of a stranger, even if their title had originated in a disseisin.

Case Details

Case Name: Martin v. Sterling
Court Name: Connecticut Superior Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1790
Citation: 1 Root 210
Court Abbreviation: Conn. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.