Martin v. StateMartin v. State
- Reporters:
- , , ,
- Before:
- Blackburn
In Martin v. State, 217 Ga. App. 860 (460 SE2d 92) (1995), we reversed the trial court’s denial of Michael DeWayne Martin’s motion in limine to suppress his breath test results based upon the law existing at the time of the rendition of our decision. See former
In its opinion, the Supreme Court recognized that our original opinion was correct when issued. However, the Supreme Court was bound to apply the law as it existed at the time of its consideration of the case. In doing so, the Supreme Court determined that the new amendment to
Judgment affirmed.
McMurray, P. J., and Andrews, J., concur.