Martin v. State
23 Ga. App. 13 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1918
1. There was no error in the admission of testimony complained of in the special ground of the motion for a new trial. The evidence was admissible for what it was worth.
2. The evidence in this ease, connecting the defendant with the whiskv found by the officer, while entirely circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.