History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martin v. State
20 Ala. App. 593
Ala. Ct. App.
1925
Check Treatment

The first count in the indictment charged that the defendant manufactured prohibited liquor, but as to this count the court gave the affirmative charge for the defendant, which eliminates all questions arising under that charge.

As to the second count, the evidence for the state, and the only evidence, as to a still is that there was found, "A lard can with a hole cut in the top of the lid; a trough with a hole in each end of it; a pipe about 100 yards away hanging in a tree." There was no evidence that either one or all of these articles were suitable or commonly used in manufacturing liquor, so as to make out a prima facie case under section 1, Acts 1919, p. 1086.

Under authority of Wilson v. State (Ala.App.) 100 So. 914;1 State ex rel. Davis, 211, Ala. 574, 100 So. 917, and authorities there cited, the judgment in this case is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

1 Ante, p. 62.

Case Details

Case Name: Martin v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 12, 1925
Citation: 20 Ala. App. 593
Docket Number: 1 Div. 620.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.