History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martin v. Smith
10 Ind. 341
Ind.
1858
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This was a bill in chancery to foreclose a mortgage. The suit was commenced in 1851, but the pleadings were not perfected and issues joined until the March term of the Court, 1854. The cause was then submitted to the Court for trial. The Court found for the plaintiffs below, overruled a motion for a new trial, and entered judgment pursuant to the finding.

The appellant complains that the amount found by the *342Court, was mostly for interest improperly allowed on an open and unsettled account between the parties. There was no exception taken to the overruling of the motion for a new trial, and the record does not purport to contain all the evidence. That, in such a case, there is nothing before us to authorize an examination of the matter complained of, is too well settled to require the citation of authorities.

T. J. Sample, for the appellant. W. March, for the appellees.

The judgment is affirmed with 5 per cent, damages and costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Martin v. Smith
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 1, 1858
Citation: 10 Ind. 341
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.