History
  • No items yet
midpage
278 P. 224
Idaho
1929
GIYENS, J.

Respondents brought action to foreclose labor liens on mining property alleged to belong to the Idaho Hydraulic Corporation. Appellants claimed to own the property. Judgment was awarded respondents, foreclosing their liens on part of the property, that involved in this appeal, and giving them a personal judgment for additional amounts and authorizing a deficiency judgment; also determining that the liens were prior to appellant’s ownership. Notice of appeal was not served on the corporation.

*724 If appellants’ claim of superior ownership were sustained on reversal or modification (of the judgment as rendered) the respondents’ entire judgment would have to be satisfied out of assets of the corporation other than those here involved : thus the corporation would be injured and hence was a party which should have been served even though in default. (Abel v. Robert Noble Estate, 43 Ida. 391, 252 Pac. 493.)

The appeal is dismissed.

Costs awarded to respondents.

Budge, C. J., and T. Bailey Lee, ¥m. E. Lee and Varían, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Martin v. Rowland
Court Name: Idaho Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 5, 1929
Citations: 278 P. 224; 1929 Ida. LEXIS 179; 47 Idaho 722; No. 5308.
Docket Number: No. 5308.
Court Abbreviation: Idaho
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Martin v. Rowland, 278 P. 224