113 So. 713 | Fla. | 1927
Lead Opinion
This was a suit in equity by a material man against the owner to enforce an alleged material man's lien against the real estate and buildings erected thereon, as described in the bill of complaint. It does not appear that the heirs of John H. Havlin were necessary parties to the suit. Title to the land might have been in the executrix of John H. Havlin. *206
Decree was in favor of the complainant for the sum of $442.54 principal, $95.70 interest, and $53.82 as fee for Complainant's Solicitor.
The record discloses no reversible error except that committed by the Chancellor in entering the decree for solicitor's fees.
That part of the decree allowing fees for complainant's solicitor should be reversed upon authority of the opinion in the case of Palm Beach Bank Trust Company v. Lainhart et al.,
Reversed in part.
WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.
ELLIS, C. J., AND STRUM AND BROWN, J. J., concur in the opinion.
Concurrence Opinion
The basis of classification involved in Chapter 9323, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1923, is distinguishable from that involved in the Texas statute construed and held valid in M. K. T. Ry. Co. v. Cade,