Martin v. Raborn
42 Ala. 648
Ala.1868Check TreatmentThe ward was entitled at his election to have the property in which his guardian invested his funds, and also the profits derived from those funds. The relief of the ward in this case will involve the necessity of divesting titles to real estate and taking an account of profits. The powers of the probate court were not adequate to grant the relief sought by the complainant.
Reversed and remanded.