126 Ga. 436 | Ga. | 1906
1. Where, after proeessioners have duly made out and certified a plat as required by law, a protest to their action is filed by an adjoining landowner and the same is returned to the superior court, where a verdict is rendered sustaining the return of the proeessioners, and such return is made the judgment of the court, the judgment unappealed from is conclusive as against the protestant and his privies in title. Howland v. Brown, 92 Ga. 513.
2. After such judgment, the true line between the coterminous proprietors is that marked by the proeessioners, and any invasion thereafter across, the line thus established and upon the land,of the adjacent owner by the protestant in the processioning proceeding would amount to a trespass.
3. If repeated acts of wrong are done or threatened, so as to make the trespass a continuous one, they may be repressed in equity by injunction.
4. There was no error in'the allowance and rejection of evidence, and the. court did not abuse its discretion in granting the injunction.
Judgment affirmed.