Martin v. GoordMartin v. Goord
Proceeding pursuant to
At the conclusion of a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit refusing a direct order, creating a disturbance, leaving an assigned area without authorization, possessing tools without authorization, and harassment. This
The misbehavior report and the hearing testimony of the other inmates involved in the incident provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Binns v Goord, 12 AD3d 1006, 1007 [2004]; Matter of Concepcion v Miller, 247 AD2d 695, 695-696 [1998]). Petitioner‘s contention that the misbehavior report is deficient because it did not state the specific role he played in the incident is without merit inasmuch as the misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed to apprise petitioner of the charges against him and to enable him to prepare a defense (see
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.