History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martin v. Connors
655 N.E.2d 736
Ohio
1995
Check Treatment

In Mandamus. On motion to amend complaint to add respondents Judge Hoffman and Judge Sargeant, and on answer of respondent. Motion to amend granted and answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Martin v. Connors
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 18, 1995
Citation: 655 N.E.2d 736
Docket Number: 95-1846
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.